PDF (5966K)
摘要
为了研究传爆药在战场上对高温火焰的敏感程度及响应程度,选用JFox、JH-14、PBXN-53种典型的传爆药,用油压机压制大约90%理论密度的药柱,以美军标MIL-STD-2105C和北约军标STANAG4240为参考确立了快速烤燃和慢速烤燃实验方法,以模拟遭受火灾、高温时的战场环境。通过对响应时间及响应时间段内火焰的平均温度的分析,并根据壳体破碎状态及位置、残药数量和位置、鉴证板状态等,判定传爆药的响应等级。实验结果表明,JH-14较为敏感,快速烤燃实验中发生爆燃,慢速烤燃实验中发生了爆轰,属于易损性弹药;PBXN-5较为敏感,对壳体破坏大,快速烤燃响应等级为爆燃,慢速烤燃响应等级为爆燃,不属于非易损性弹药;JFox较为钝感,对壳体破坏小,快速烤燃响应等级和慢速烤燃响应等级都是燃烧,属于低易损性传爆药。
Abstract
In order to study the sensitivity and responsiveness of booster to high temperature flame in battlefield,three typical booster explosives,JFox,JH-14 and PBXN-5,were used to suppress the theoretical density of about 90% by hydraulic press,and the fast cook-off test method and slow cook-off test method were established with reference to the US military standard MIL-STD-2105C and NATO military standard STANAG 4240.Cook-off test method was used to simulate the battlefield environment under fire and high temperature.Through the analysis of response time and average temperature of flame in response time,and according to the crushing state and position of shell,the quantity and position of residue and the state of identification plate,the response grade of booster explosive was determined.The test results shown that JH-14 was more sensitive,detonation occured in fast cook-off test and detonation occured in slow cook-off test,which belonged to vulnerable ammunition.PBXN-5 was more sensitive,and had damage to the shell.The response level of fast cook-off was detonation,and the response level of slow cook-off was detonation,which was not a non-vulnerable ammunition.JFox was more insensitive,had small damage to the shell,fast cook-off response level and slow cook-off response level were burning,belonged to LOVA booster explosive.
关键词
传爆药
/
快速烤燃
/
慢速烤燃
/
热安全性
/
低易损性
Key words
explosive booster
/
fast cook-off
/
slow cook-off
/
thermal safety
/
low vulnerability (LOVA)
三种典型传爆药烤燃研究[J].
化工新型材料, 2020, 48(2): 152-156 DOI:
[1] 王红星,王晓晓,罗一鸣,等.DNAN炸药的烤燃实验[J].含能材料,2009,17 (2):183-186.
[2] 赵亮.尺寸效应对炸药烤燃响应特性影响的研究[D].太原:中北大学,2018.
[3] 徐双培,胡双启,王东青,等.壳体密封性对小尺寸弹药快速烤燃响应规律的影响[J].火炸药学报,2009,32 (3):35-37.
[4] 中国科学技术协会.第十六届中国科协年会第九分会场含能材料及绿色民爆产业发展论坛论文集[C].昆明:中国科学技术协会,云南省人民政府,2014.
[5] 王晓峰,戴蓉兰,涂健.传爆药的烤燃实验[J].火工品,2001, (2):5-7,30.
[6] 智小琦,胡双启,肖志华,等.密封条件对钝化RDX快速烤燃响应特性的影响[J].火炸药学报,2010,33 (1):31-37.
[7] 刘文杰.传爆药烤燃响应特性的数值仿真及实验研究[D].太原:中北大学,2016.
[8] 孙培培,南海.壳体参数对炸药快速烤燃响应的影响[J].火工品,2016 (4):29-31.
[9] 杨建,王建灵,高赞,等.装药直径对HMX基炸药慢速烤燃性能的影响[J].四川兵工学报,2015,36 (6):117-119,127.
[10] 安强,胡双启.装药密度对钝化黑索今快速烤燃特性的影响[J].四川兵工学报,2010,31 (10):64-66.
[11] 智小琦,胡双启.炸药装药密度对慢速烤燃响应特性的影响[J].爆炸与冲击,2013,33 (2):221-224.
[12] Department of defense test method standard,MIL-STD-2105C.Hazard assessment tests for non-nuclear munitions[S].2003,05.
[13] NATO standardization agreement,STANAG4240.Liquid fuel/external fire munition test procedures[S].Brussels,Belgium,2003,05.
[14] 王洪伟,智小琦,郝春杰,等.升温速率对限定条件下烤燃弹热起爆临界温度的影响[J].含能材料,2016,4 (1):380-385.
[15] 陈朗,李贝贝.DNAN炸药烤燃特征[J].含能材料,2016,1:27-32.
[16] 张阔,罗亚军,陈晓明,等.一种含FOX-7的发射药燃烧性能研究[J].兵工自动化,2013,32 (11):60-62.
[17] 刘晶如.含1,1-二氨基-2,2-二硝基乙烯推进剂的能量特性参数计算研究[J].化学推进剂与高分子材料,2013,11 (1):79-82,85.
[18] 蒲翰涛.典型炸药烤燃试验中多步化学反应动力学研究[D].绵阳:中国工程物理研究院,2016.
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(11572292);国家自然科学基金(11572292)