采用热重-差热分析仪研究DAPCO 2200、3M-AC-380两种密封材料在氮气氛围、不同升温速率条件下的热解特性规律。结果表明:在氮气氛围下,DAPCO 2200密封胶、3M-AC-380密封胶的热解均有2个阶段,热解过程中二者的初始温度相差较大;终止温度均随升温速率的提高向高温方向移动;热解速率、质量损失速率随着升温速率的提高而增大。热解动力学分析表明,在热解反应开始阶段表观活化能相对较小,热解速度相对较快;随着转化率的升高,表观活化能变大,材料热解速度降低。采用Kissinger法、Flynn-Wall-Ozawa法计算表观活化能,DAPCO 2200密封胶表观活化能平均值分别为109.08kJ/mol、144.88kJ/mol,3M-AC-380密封胶表观活化能平均值分别为99.43kJ/mol,81.71kJ/mol。DAPCO 2200密封胶2个阶段的初始分解温度、最终分解温度以及最大质量损失速率温度均高于3M-AC-380密封胶,表明DAPCO 2200密封胶的热稳定性较好。
The pyrolysis characteristics of DAPCO 2200 and 3M-AC-380 sealing material were studied by thermogravimetric-differential thermal analysis under different heating rates in a nitrogen atmosphere.The results showed that the pyrolysis of DAPCO 2200 sealant and 3M-AC-380 sealant had two stages in a nitrogen atmosphere,and the initial temperatures of DAPCO 2200 sealant and 3M-AC-380 sealant were quite different during the pyrolysis process.With the increase of heating rate,the termination temperatures moved towards high temperature.The pyrolysis rate and mass loss rate increased with the increase of heating rate.The pyrolysis kinetics analysis revealed that the apparent activation energy was relatively small and the pyrolysis rate was relatively fast in the initial stage of the pyrolysis reaction.With the increase of conversion rate,the apparent activation energy increased and the pyrolysis rate decreased.Using the Kissinger method and Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method to calculate the apparent activation energy,the average values for DAPCO 2200 sealant were 109.08kJ/mol and 144.88kJ/mol,respectively,and the average values for 3M-AC-380 sealant were 99.43kJ/mol and 81.71kJ/mol,respectively.The initial decomposition temperature,final decomposition temperature and maximum mass loss rate temperature of the two stages of DAPCO 2200 sealant were higher than 3M-AC-380 sealant,indicating that the thermal stability of DAPCO 2200 sealant was better.
[1] Slusarski L,Janowska G,Schulz P.Thermal stability and combustibility of rubbers and sealing plates[J].Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,2013,111(2):1577-1583.
[2] 韦震宇,邹华,张立群,等.硅橡胶阻燃及成炭性能研究[J].特种橡胶制品,2011,32(2):15-20.
[3] 陈自正,蒋金博,朱应和,等.改性氢氧化铝/三聚氰胺在硅酮密封胶中的协同阻燃研究[J].中国建筑防水,2022(4):17-20;39.
[4] 张旭,杨柳,王志.四种典型航空用橡胶材料的燃烧行为研究[J].消防科学与技术,2017,36(3):302-304.
[5] 王志,慕鹏,卜庆伟,等.防火密封胶热分解动力学研究[J].中国胶粘剂,2019,28(10):24-27;35.
[6] 张旭,冯雅静,王志,等.典型航空密封胶的热解和燃烧特性研究[J].中国胶粘剂,2018,27(6):6-9.
[7] 张旭,卜庆伟,王志.飞机指定区用防火密封硅胶燃烧特性及热解动力学研究[J].高校化学工程学报,2020,34(1):136-142.
[8] 叶李薇,张亚博,彭华乔,等.聚硫醚密封剂研究进展[J].化工新型材料,2017,45(9):201-204.
[9] 陈晨.飞机橡胶密封材料的发展及应用[J].橡塑技术与装备,2016,42(2):56-57.
[10] 李燕.先进商用飞机上密封胶应用研究[J].科技与企业,2015(24):175;178.
[11] 雷海军.航空用橡胶型材在我国的发展及应用[J].特种橡胶制品,2015,36(5):79-82.
[12] Selvi M,Devaraju S,Alagar M,et al.Synthesis and characte-rization of thermally stable and flame retardant poly(benzoxazine-co-urethane) matrices[J].Journal of Macromolecular Science:Part A,2018,55(9):668-675.
[13] Maria W,Dorota O W,Weronika G,et al.Function alization effect on physico-mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes/epoxy composites[J].Polymers for Advanced Technologies,2011,22:48-59.
[14] 刘振海.热分析与量热仪及其应用[M].第2版.北京:化学工业出版社,2011.
[15] Ding H Y,Xia C L,Wang J F,et al.Inherently fiame-retardant flexible bio-based polyurethane sealant with phosphorus and nitrogen-containing polyurethane prepolymer[J].Materials Science,2016,51(10):5008-5018.
[16] 邢袆琳,李韶亮,刘刚.低密度航空聚硫密封剂的组成及性能研究[J].化工新型材料,2017,45(10):130-132.
[17] 胡荣祖,史启祯.热分析动力学[M].第2版.北京:科学出版社,2008.
[18] 任宁,张建军.热分析动力学数据处理方法的研究进展[J].化学进展,2006,18(4):410-416.
[19] 吴鹏.大型客机碳纤维环氧复合材料防火特性研究[D].沈阳:沈阳航空航天大学,2019.
[20] Kim M,Sung D H,Kong K H,et al.Characterization of resistive heating and themoelectric behavior of discontinuous carbon fiber-epoxy composites[J].Composites Part B,2016,90:37-44.
[21] 毛俊杰,王志,文放,等.多层碳纤维/环氧树脂复合材料热解动力学[J].沈阳航空航天大学学报,2022,39(2):21-27.
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(61901283);辽宁省自然科学基金(201602567)
PDF
