碳纤维预浸料作为外场胶结维修补片的主要材料,其固化工艺将直接影响补片的微观结构和力学性能。针对一种碳纤维预浸料进行差示扫描量热测试,研究预浸料的固化反应特征温度和固化动力学参数,并对不同固化工艺的维修补片进行微观形貌分析和拉伸性能测试。结果表明,不同固化保温时间得到的试样样条拉伸性能有明显差别,且拉伸强度和弹性模量随固化保温时间的增加而增大,充分的固化使得试件性能变得更为均匀,但拉伸破坏应变保持不变。保温时间越长,随着固化度的增加,树脂和碳纤结合地更加良好,因此复合材料的拉伸性能更好。该碳纤维预浸料在温度436.4K条件下固化,并保温120min制作的维修补片具有最佳拉伸力学性能。
As the main material of field cemented repair patches,the curing process of carbon fiber prepreg directly affects the microstructure and mechanical properties of the patches.A kind of carbon fiber prepreg was tested by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to study its curing reaction characteristic temperature and curing kinetic parameters.The micro morphology analysis and tensile properties tests were carried on the repair patches with different curing processes.The results showed that the tensile properties of the specimens obtained with different curing and holding time were obviously different,and the tensile strength and elastic modulus increased with the increase of curing and holding time.Full curing made the properties of the specimens more uniform,but the tensile failure strain remained unchanged.The longer the holding time,the better the combination of resin and carbon fiber with the increase of curing degree,so the tensile property of the composite was better.The repair patch made of the carbon fiber prepreg cured at 436.4K,and had the best tensile mechanical properties after holding for 120min.
[1] 崔海涛,孙志刚.航空复合材料及其力学分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2017.
[2] 戴京涛,刘浩东,赵培仲,等.修复工艺对复合材料抗拉强度的影响[J].兵器材料科学与工程,2020,43(3):18-22.
[3] 苏雨茹,关志东,王鑫,等.挖补修理复合材料层合板静力压缩与疲劳性能试验研究[J].复合材料科学与工程,2021(5):98-103.
[4] 梁凤飞,金迪,何勇.复合材料结构修理研究[J].中国胶粘剂,2019,28(5):57-61.
[5] 梁重云,曾竟成,肖加余,等.复合材料补片胶接修补研究进展[J].宇航材料工艺,2002(4):7-11.
[6] 尚武林,熊浩,张斯纬,等.碳纤维预浸料用中温固化环氧树脂体系[J].合成纤维,2013,42(10):1-5.
[7] 刘国春,郭荣辉,秦文峰.民用飞机复合材料结构制造与维修[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2020.
[8] 周长庚,荀国立,王文贵,等.修理用低温固化复合材料(CF3031/LTC80)的工艺及性能研究[J].纤维复合材料,2020,37(2):3-8.
[9] Yung K C,Zhu B L,Yue T M,et al.Preparation and properties of hollow glass microsphere-filled epoxy-matrix composites[J].Composites Science and Technology,2009,69(2):260-264.
[10] Pihtili H.An experimental investigation of wear of glass fiber-epoxy resin and glass fiber-polyester resin composite materials[J].European Polymer Journal,2009,45:149-154.
[11] Hameed N,Sreekumar P A,Francis B,et al.Morphology,dynamic mechanical and thermal studies on poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile) modified epoxy resin/glass fiber composites[J].Composites Part A:Applied Science and Manufacturing,2007,38:2422-2432.
[12] GB/T 3354—1999,定向纤维增强聚合物基复合材料拉伸性能试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.
[13] 刘克健,高玉龙.一种快速固化的环氧树脂基预浸料及其性能[J].材料导报,2020,34(S2):1576-1579,1585.
[14] 王洪恩,杨洋,陈璐圆,等.一种高温碳纤维环氧预浸料的固化反应动力学[J].航空制造技术,2013(Z2):111-113,117.
[15] 沈艳.基于能量转化平衡的CFRP构件固化度在线监测方法[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2021.
[16] 孙文兵,张超灿.等温DSC法研究聚酰胺与环氧树脂的固化动力学[J].武汉理工大学学报,2009.31(6):28-31.
[17] Kissinger H E.Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis[J].Analytical Chemistry,1957,29(11):1702-1706.
[18] Crane L W,Dynes P J,Kaelble D H.Analysis of curing kinetics in polymer composites[J].Journal of Polymer Letters Edition,1973,11(8):533-540.
[19] 卢晓东,黄玉东,张春华.环氧树脂/苯并GFDA1唑二胺体系的固化动力学及热性能研究[J].固体火箭技术,2008.31(3):295-298.
[20] 陈平,张岩,石岩,等.潜伏性树脂体系固化反应动力学参数的特征研究[J].复合材料学报,1999,16(1):52-57.
基金资助
国家自然科学基金民航联合基金重点项目(U1233202);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金中国民用航空飞行学院青年基金项目(QJ2022-38)
PDF
